Saturday, August 23, 2008

Rail tickets for highest bidder

Just came across the below article -

Indian Railways plans to launch an online auction of its Sleeper and AC class train tickets. According to a report by PTI, about 10 to 20 per cent seats in select trains may be made available for online bidding. The online auction would open 48 hours before the departure time and close two hours before the scheduled departure.

It's brilliant. Of course biased towards the richer lot of people who travel by train but still interesting because this in this system the market truly decides :) There is a demand and a supply and depending on both, a price will emerge. Also it will help the railways make more money. Might mean more difficulty in getting seats (at the standard rate) but still would be interesting.

comScore July 2008 Search Rankings

comScore Core Search Report*
July 2008 vs. June 2008
Total U.S. – Home/Work/University Locations
Source: comScore qSearch 2.0

Core Search Entity

Share of Searches (%)

Jun-08

Jul-08

Point Change

Jul-08 vs. Jun-08

Total Core Search

100.0%

100.0%

NA

Google Sites

61.5%

61.9%

0.4

Yahoo! Sites

20.9%

20.5%

-0.4

Microsoft Sites

9.2%

8.9%

-0.3

Ask Network

4.3%

4.5%

0.2

AOL LLC

4.1%

4.2%

0.1

* Based on the five major search engines including partner searches and cross-channel searches. Searches for mapping, local directory, and user-generated video sites that are not on the core domain of the five search engines are not included in the core search numbers.



Americans conducted 11.8 billion searches at the core search engines, representing a 2-percent gain versus June. Google Sites handled nearly 7.3 billion core searches (up 2 percent), followed by Yahoo! Sites with 2.4 billion and Microsoft Sites with 1 billion.


comScore Core Search Report*
July 2008 vs. June 2008
Total U.S. – Home/Work/University Locations
Source: comScore qSearch 2.0

Core Search Entity

Search Queries (MM)

Jun-08

Jul-08

Percent Change

Jul-08 vs. Jun-08

Total Core Search

11,541

11,753

2%

Google Sites

7,096

7,273

2%

Yahoo! Sites

2,416

2,405

0%

Microsoft Sites

1,056

1,045

-1%

Ask Network

501

531

6%

AOL LLC

471

499

6%

* Based on the five major search engines including partner searches and cross-channel searches. Searches for mapping, local directory, and user-generated video sites that are not on the core domain of the five search engines are not included in the core search numbers.


Full article at - comScore

Friday, August 22, 2008

Quality Score 'improvements'

In case you don't know already, do read the article I am copy pasting from the Inside Adwords Blog.

My feel is that this change has a lot of benefits to a lot of people. Google obviously because they can earn a little more money on words that would not have displayed advertisements before. Certain advertisers who do get impressions and clicks on words that were previously inactive.

I do like the idea of quality being judged on a real time basis every time. I don't even want to imagine how much load it would put on the system but anyway if anyone can pull it off, it's Google.

I never did like the idea of keywords going inactive on search for no reason other than the fact that not too much related to them on the landing page. I mean if I had to target students looking to go to college, I would want to advertise on names of colleges and admission procedure stuff etc even though I none of it on my landing pages.

Anyway lets see what sort of impact advertisers see with the changes.


From the Inside Adwords Blog -

In July 2005, AdWords introduced minimum bids for keywords based on Quality Score. This system allows us to show very high quality ads to Google users, while also giving advertisers control over their keywords. Since 2005, we've improved Quality Score in many ways, such as the inclusion of landing page quality and landing page load time as factors. Along the way, we've also received much helpful feedback from both users and advertisers.

Today, we'd like to let you know of further improvements we'll introduce in the coming weeks -- based, in part, on this feedback. First we'll outline the key points, and then dive into the details:
  • Quality Score will now be more accurate because it will be calculated at the time of each search query
  • Keywords will no longer be marked 'inactive for search'
  • 'First page bid' will replace 'minimum bid' in your account
A more accurate Quality Score

Most importantly, we are replacing our static per-keyword Quality Scores with a system that will evaluate an ad's quality each time it matches a search query. This way, AdWords will use the most accurate, specific, and up-to-date performance information when determining whether an ad should be displayed. Your ads will be more likely to show when they're relevant and less likely to show when they're not. This means that Google users are apt to see better ads while you, as an advertiser, should receive leads which are more highly qualified.

Keywords no longer marked 'inactive for search'

The new per-query evaluation of Quality Score affects you in that keywords will no longer appear as 'inactive for search' in your account. Instead, all keywords will have the chance to show ads on Google web search and the search network (unless you've paused or deleted them). Keep in mind, however, that keywords previously marked 'inactive for search' are not likely to accrue a great deal of traffic following this change. This is because their combined per-query Quality Score and bid probably isn't high enough to gain competitive placement.

'First page bid' will replace 'minimum bid'

As a result of migrating to per-query Quality Score, we are no longer showing minimum bids in your account. Instead, we're replacing minimum bids with a new, more meaningful metric: first page bids. First page bids are an estimate of the bid it would take for your ad to reach the first page of search results on Google web search. They're based on the exact match version of the keyword, the ad's Quality Score, and current advertiser competition on that keyword. Based on your feedback, we learned that knowing your minimum bid wasn't always helpful in getting the ad placement you wanted, so we hope that first page bids will give you better guidance on how to achieve your advertising goals.

It's worth mentioning that the impact of these changes will vary from advertiser to advertiser; some might see no changes to their ad serving, while others may see a noticeable difference. As always, we recommend optimizing ads to prevent them from receiving a low Quality Score.

Putting it all together

Here's an example to illustrate how per-query Quality Score works:

Nancy's Dairy advertises on the keyword 'milk.' Nancy's ads perform better on the keyword 'milk' in the U.S. than in Canada. Her ads also perform better on the query 'milk delivery' than on 'milk,' and better on certain search network sites than on others. Instead of one static Quality Score and minimum bid that determines whether the keyword 'milk' is eligible to trigger an ad for all search queries, we will now determine eligibility dynamically, based on factors such as location, the specific query, and other relevance factors. For that reason, Nancy's keyword 'milk' will be able to trigger an ad for search queries where it's likely to perform better, i.e., in the U.S., on 'milk delivery' and on certain search network sites.

We're working to update the AdWords API and AdWords Editor so that, in the future, they will support first page bids. Until then, both the AdWords API and AdWords Editor will continue to show the minimum bid field. However, the information shown in this field will be based on the new per-query Quality Score. You may keep current with upcoming API releases on the API Blog and learn about upcoming AdWords Editor releases via the AdWords Editor Forum.

Finally, please note that we'll release these Quality Score changes to a very small segment of advertisers within the next day or two, so that we can gather feedback before launching to all our advertisers. We will, of course, post again in advance of the time that these changes go live for everyone.

In the meantime, please see this comprehensive list of frequently asked questions for more information.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Search Traffic in India

Thought that some of the below was very interesting. I must say I am very surprised that such 1.9% of people in India search on Ask. Now I know 1.9% isn't that much but Ask is at number 3 following Google and Yahoo. I would have thought that MSN would have come in 3rd followed maybe then by Rediff.


The other point that was interesting was that Google has 81% of the search traffic. I thought this number was much higher. More like between 85%- 88%. Anyway read on for details.


Google sites received the majority of searches conducted in India according to a study of the online search market from comScore.

Google sites in India had more than 1 billion searches conducted in June, representing 81 percent of the market. Yahoo sites ranked a distant second with 117 million searches accounting for 9.4 percent. Ask Network landed in the third spot with 24 million searches representing 1.9 percent of the market.

Microsoft sites trailed Ask grabbing 22 million searches and accounting for 1.7 percent of the market. Indian Internet portal Rediff.com was ranked fifth with 18 million searches accounting for 1.5 percent.

India is one the most rapidly emerging Internet markets in the world in terms of overall usage growth, but the country has less frequent search behavior than its global counterparts. Of the 37 countries individually reported by comScore, India ranked second to last with 53 searches per user during the month, below the global average of 93.

(Source : WebProNews.com)

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Union Bank of ?????

Horrible way for your ad to show. This is from Facebook. (The squares on the right are pictures - basically wanted to capture the whole ad and show it as I saw it).

This is not the first time I have seen an ad displaying badly on Facebook but never has anything looked this bad. I mean unless I know the logo or unless the name shows up somewhere else during the ad is playing, I don't even know which bank this is.

I don't know if the mess up is at the agency that is creating the ad, or at the publisher that sold the space or at Facebook's end but it's definitely a bad way to show the ad.

Saturday, August 16, 2008

Some interesting Facebook Statistics

[All data taken from what is published on Facebook]
  • More than 90 million active users
  • Facebook is the 4th most-trafficked website in the world (comScore)
  • Facebook is the most-trafficked social media site in the world (comScore)

  • Over 55,000 regional, work-related, collegiate, and high school networks
  • The fastest growing demographic is those 25 years old and older

  • No. 1 photo sharing application on the Web (comScore)
  • Photo application draws more than twice as much traffic as the next three sites combined (comScore)
  • More than 24 million photos uploaded daily
  • More than 6 million active user groups on the site

  • More than 400,000 developers and entrepreneurs on Facebook
  • Over 24,000 applications have been built on Facebook Platform
  • 140 new applications added per day
  • More than 95% of Facebook members have used at least one application built on Facebook Platform

New and Improved Blogger dashboard

The blogger dashboard has a new look. It's very nice and clean. Will take some getting used to but over all I'm happy.



Also a bunch of new features for bloggers (from http://buzz.blogger.com)-
  • Google Gadgets in your Layouts blog can now set their height automatically (if the gadget author supports it). Read more about adding Google Gadgets to your blog.
  • AdSense page elements can now optionally have image ads. We’ve found image ads have a higher click-through rate, so you might get more money if you turn them on.
  • We wrote up a Features page to help you keep track of everything you can do with Blogger. Take a look and see if you’ve been missing out on something cool.
Happy Blogging!

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Shaadi on your Mobile

As if the tie up with Dish TV wasn't enough, Shaadi.com has now tied up with Vodafone to make its services available on mobile platform. The tie-up would enable Vodafone users to access Shaadi.com’s services.

‘Shaadi.com on Vodafone’ will enable Vodafone users to search and view profile details of other members without the need to log on to internet. Mobile phone users would be able to browse through profiles, express interest in members, accept or decline interest sent to them by other members and send personalised messages to their prospective matches. (Source: AlooTechie)

I think the world is going crazy. I mean it is great to get your product out to your target audience, but this is too much. Imagine people browsing profiles on their TV and now on their mobile phones. It's quite unbelievable if you ask me.

Well India IS a country obsessed with marriage so why not?

Friday, August 08, 2008

New features on the Google Content Network

A little excited about this.

Thanks to Google buying DoubleClick, Google will add a bunch of features onto the content network such as 'frequency capping, better reach and frequency reporting, and view-through conversions'.

The features will start rolling out in the next few months. Not sure if this will be available to advertisers irrespective of (advertising) geography but let's see.

Honestly Google is releasing more stuff than advertisers are comfortable digesting (in my opinion at least). But more features and more insight just means better targeting and therefore better ROI, so bring it on I say.

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Google to sell Performics to Publicis Groupe

Google said Wednesday that it had found a willing buyer for its Performics search-marketing unit: Publicis Groupe, the giant French advertising holding company.

Performics had been owned by DoubleClick, and ever since Google’s acquisition of that company closed, Google has been expected to unload Performics. The conflict of interest is pretty clear, given that Performics advises clients on how to maximize their visibility on Google.
Google itself said as much back in April.

Source - New York Times Blog.

A simple idea - a brilliant idea

A while ago I heard of this website going to be launched. Back then when I heard the idea, I think it was so brilliant and yet so simple. I couldn't believe how no one had thought of this already.

youCharades.com is officially launched. I think you should check it out. It's dumb charades, youtube style.

Below is a sample charade - See if you can guess it.



Simple idea that's going to make this website become a HUGE hit if it takes off. Not only are you watching and guessing, you can create your own charade and put it up. I still can't believe there hasn't already been a 'you charades' launched before.

I must warn you, it can be quite addictive especially once you get a couple of answers right. Happy guessing.

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Google Webinars

The Calender for Google Webinars is available at - Google Adwords Events Calender

Google Insights for Search

And yet again Google gives us some data back in a nicely packaged format.

If you haven't checked it out as yet, please visit - Google Insights for Search

What you will find here is pretty interesting. It is much like Google Trends but gives a lot more data like - 'interest over time, regional interest, top search terms, rising searches (still don't know what breakout means under this section), etc.

Still making sense of all that is there but it obviously helps to have this tool. If for nothing else then to put in presentations to show to clients.

For more information you can visit the Inside Adwords Blog

Monday, August 04, 2008

Bad Branding?

I happened to notice the below Naukri ad today. Couldn't help but thing is was a badly executed ad. (My views totally - I have nothing against Naukri or any other job portal. In fact when I was first looking for a job, I had uploaded my resume on Naukri only)


What I think is wrong with this ad -
1) (Biggest issue) The ad is too cluttered. To many things screaming for attention.
2) The ad is divided into 2 parts. One with the brown background and one with the site. Some how on the site I only noticed the part which had the brown background and only figured it was a Naukri ad cause I wondered which advertiser this was. Which is why the post of the title - is this bad branding?
3) The whole 'Salary Grid' is such a waste. It might be seen as a attention catcher but I don't think it helps if people are not going to notice Naukri.com
4) Too many 'buttons'. There are 5 top clients and a 'Post Your Resume Now' button. While I do understand that clicking anywhere on the ad will take you to a landing page, there should be a better demarcation of the Call to Action button.
5) For 'lakhs' I think is a little off cause obviously there are no lakhs of high paying jobs. They should have stuck to thousands.

I wish I was a designer and could have re-done the add real quickly. I would have killed the 'salary grid', made small changes in the copy, given emphasis to naukri, maybe moved the companies (that are offering jobs on naukri) to a vertical format, had a bigger, more distinct call to action button.

I don't know if these changes would have improved the quality of the ad as I am imagining or not but personally I think it would have at least been slightly better if not by a lot.

In the words of Michelangelo 'Trifles make perfection and perfection is not trifle' :)